 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Cumulative AIDS CasesNew AIDS CasesAnnual AIDS Case RatePersons Living with AIDSCumulative Reported HIV Infections (Cases)Annual Reported HIV Infections (Cases)DeathsHIV/AIDS FundingRyan White ProgramAIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP)HIV TestingHIV in PrisonsOther HIV/AIDS-Related PoliciesAIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP) Policies Related to Eligibility of Part D Clients, June 2008
| Dually Eligible Clients Not Eligible for ADAP | Full Subsidy Clients Not Eligible for ADAP | Partial Subsidy Clients Not Eligible for ADAP | Standard Clients Not Eligible for ADAP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 19 | 10 | 10 |
| Alabama | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Alaska | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Arizona | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Arkansas | NA | Yes | NA | NA |
| California | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Colorado | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Connecticut | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Delaware | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| District of Columbia | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Florida | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Georgia | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Hawaii | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Idaho | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Illinois | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Indiana | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Iowa | NA | NA | NA | Yes |
| Kansas | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Kentucky | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Louisiana | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Maine | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Maryland | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Massachusetts | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Michigan | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Minnesota | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Mississippi | NA | NA | NA | Yes |
| Missouri | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Montana | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Nebraska | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Nevada | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| New Hampshire | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| New Jersey | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| New Mexico | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| New York | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| North Carolina | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| North Dakota | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Ohio | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Oklahoma | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Oregon | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Pennsylvania | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Rhode Island | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| South Carolina | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| South Dakota | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Tennessee | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Texas | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Utah | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Vermont | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Virginia | Yes | Yes | NA | NA |
| Washington | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| West Virginia | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Wisconsin | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA |
| Wyoming | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Guam | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Puerto Rico | Yes | NA | NA | NA |
| Virgin Islands | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Notes: | 52 ADAPs reported data. American Samoa, Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, Northern Mariana Islands, Rhode Island, and Virgin Islands (U.S.) did not report data. Many ADAPs chose to disenroll clients receiving any portion of the Part D subsidy because the benefit provided them comprehensive care. In many instances, when standard clients were disenrolled from ADAP, they were consequently enrolled in a state pharmaceutical assistance program (SPAP). For more information on the low-income subsidy, see Kaiser's Fact Sheet on Low-Income Assistance Under the Medicare Drug Benefit. |
| Sources: | National ADAP Monitoring Project Annual Report, National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, Kaiser Family Foundation, April 2009, available at http://www.kff.org/hivaids/ADAP.cfm and at http://www.nastad.org. |
| Definitions: | NA: The ADAP has not determined a policy or the ADAP did not report its policy. |
 |  | Help |
|