KFF.orgState Health Facts - Your source for state health data
Kaiser Family Foundation Kaiser Health News Kaiser Family Foundation

     Choose a different category...

Demographics and the Economy 
Population
People in Poverty
Household Income
Geography
Employment Status
Unemployment
Food Stamp Program
State Fiscal Distress
State Budgets
Gross State Product
Taxes
State or Federal Inmates
Print

Poverty Rate by Metropolitan Status, states (2007-2008), U.S. (2008)

|
|
|

Show:

Rank By:
|

Data View:

percent

United StatesPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan18%
Non-Metropolitan20%


AlabamaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan19%
Non-Metropolitan23%

AlaskaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan12%
Non-Metropolitan12%

ArizonaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan20%
Non-Metropolitan30%

ArkansasPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-Metropolitan25%

CaliforniaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan20%
Non-Metropolitan17%

ColoradoPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan13%
Non-Metropolitan12%

ConnecticutPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan13%
Non-Metropolitan15%

DelawarePercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan14%
Non-Metropolitan17%

District of ColumbiaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan22%
Non-MetropolitanNSD

FloridaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan17%
Non-Metropolitan26%

GeorgiaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan18%
Non-Metropolitan25%

HawaiiPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-Metropolitan17%

IdahoPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan14%
Non-Metropolitan15%

IllinoisPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan16%
Non-Metropolitan17%

IndianaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan18%
Non-Metropolitan15%

IowaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan12%
Non-Metropolitan12%

KansasPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan14%
Non-Metropolitan17%

KentuckyPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan21%
Non-Metropolitan22%

LouisianaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan23%
Non-Metropolitan27%

MainePercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan13%
Non-Metropolitan16%

MarylandPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-Metropolitan22%

MassachusettsPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan16%
Non-Metropolitan7%

MichiganPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan17%
Non-Metropolitan14%

MinnesotaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan11%
Non-Metropolitan17%

MississippiPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan23%
Non-Metropolitan30%

MissouriPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-Metropolitan21%

MontanaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-Metropolitan15%

NebraskaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan13%
Non-Metropolitan15%

NevadaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-Metropolitan12%

New HampshirePercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan10%
Non-Metropolitan10%

New JerseyPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan14%
Non-MetropolitanNSD

New MexicoPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan22%
Non-Metropolitan23%

New YorkPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan20%
Non-Metropolitan16%

North CarolinaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan17%
Non-Metropolitan23%

North DakotaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan11%
Non-Metropolitan14%

OhioPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan18%
Non-Metropolitan15%

OklahomaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan16%
Non-Metropolitan22%

OregonPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan16%
Non-Metropolitan18%

PennsylvaniaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-Metropolitan16%

Rhode IslandPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan15%
Non-MetropolitanNSD

South CarolinaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan17%
Non-Metropolitan25%

South DakotaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan10%
Non-Metropolitan18%

TennesseePercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan19%
Non-Metropolitan25%

TexasPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan22%
Non-Metropolitan24%

UtahPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan12%
Non-Metropolitan14%

VermontPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan10%
Non-Metropolitan14%

VirginiaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan12%
Non-Metropolitan25%

WashingtonPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan14%
Non-Metropolitan16%

West VirginiaPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan16%
Non-Metropolitan24%

WisconsinPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan14%
Non-Metropolitan13%

WyomingPercent0% - 100%
 
Metropolitan12%
Non-Metropolitan14%



(show/hide notes)
Notes: 

Non-Metropolitan includes both respondents living in non-metropolitan areas and areas not classified in either category.

Percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding effects.

For all topics based on the CPS on statehealthfacts.org, the grouping used for analysis is the health insurance unit (HIU), which groups individuals according to their insurance eligibility, rather than by relatedness or household.
For more details, see "Notes to Topics Based on the Current Population Survey (CPS)" at http://www.statehealthfacts.kff.org/methodology.

Sources: 

Urban Institute and Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured estimates based on the Census Bureau's March 2008 and 2009 Current Population Survey (CPS: Annual Social and Economic Supplements).

Definitions: NSD: Not Sufficient Data.
Metropolitan Statistical Area must include at least one city with 50,000 or more inhabitants, or a Census-Bureau defined urbanized area of at least 50,000 inhabitants and a total metropolitan population of 100,000 or more (75,000 in New England). For more information, visit the Census Bureau website at http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/aboutmetro.html.

Persons in poverty are defined here as those living in "health insurance units" with incomes less than 100% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) as measured by the U.S. Census Bureau's poverty thresholds. Health insurance units are related individuals who would be eligible as a group for "family" coverage in a health plan. The federal poverty threshold for a family of four in the 48 contiguous states and D.C. was $21,027 in 2007 and $21,834 in 2008. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) produces simplified - but very similar - versions of federal poverty thresholds called "poverty guidelines" for use in determining financial eligibility for many government programs. For more information on measures of poverty, please see the detailed description provided by HHS available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/faq.shtml.



     Help
KFF.org Kaiserhealthnews.org Kaiseredu.org
Search Contact Us Email Subscriptions Privacy Statement